The International Institute
for Policy, Practice and
Research in the Education
of Adults
679 W. Hancock
Detroit, Michigan 48201
U.S.A.
April, 1995
Purpose: Four
Focal Points
The International
Institute for Policy, Practice and Research in the Education of Adults has been
established to develop and implement the field of policy and politics of the
education of adults by means of an institutional strategy which is also
respondive to the needs of modern society.
This purpose is to
be accomplished by linking local adult higher education units and their social
partners by means of a network of adult education policy makers, practitioners
and researchers.
The Institute is
designed to focus on four areas which are essential if this task is to be
realized within the time available:
1. The development of international, cross
cultural criteria and procedure, for the analysis and evaluation of policies,
practices, and resulting pro-grams for the education of adults;
2. The education and training in theory, method
and practice of an interna-tional cadre of young, adult education professionals
in an international, multicultural context; the design of a curriculum,
including field exper-ience, characterized by an international content; the conscious
objective of creating a multicultural and experienced cadre for the field are
part of the task;
3. Participation in and support of: national and
international networks deal-ing with issues critical to the education of
adults; in select, indigenous adult education projects; mutual assistance
networks around specific projects; and the strengthening of professional adult
education linkages;
4. The linkage of the above three functions to
an environment for the deve-lopment of theory relevant to the field of adult
education, including the collection of basic data, clarification of basic
concepts, and the develop-ment of appropriate methodologies.
(adopted unanimously by the Institute organizing
committee meeting at the University of Leuven and Louvain-Belgium, June 4,
1993).
A Three Year Strategy
The Institute will, by the 1997 UNESCO
World Conference on Adult Edu-cation, be fully operational in these four areas
and will have prepared a working paper on Adult
Education in a Multicultural World for this import-ant event. Once this
objective has been accomplished we will review and evaluate our achievements in
the four areas and lay out our plans for the future.
Indigenous Networks
The Institute is currently working
with a number of indigenous networks dealing with the following issues:
• Ethnicity:
Conflict and Cooperation and Ethno-Development;
• Democratization:
the Voluntary Sector and Civic Literacy;
• The
Future of Work and Labour;
• The
Internationalization of the Welfare State;
• Intercultural
Education: Issue and Policies;
• Policy and the Education of Adults.
The status of the
linkage with the networks was reviewed at the January 13-20, 1995 meetings in
Detroit and a method for closer collaboration with the networks developed. This
method involves a conscious "seeding" process of participation by the
various networks in each others conferences and pro-jects, as well as the
development of some common infrastructures such as e-mail networks,
publications, teleconference and collaboration on common issues.
Participation in
networks dealing with Environment and Ecology, Urban Agendas, Literacy and a
number of other key adult education issues will be developed over the next
three years. By January 1996, the Institute will issue a catalogue of its
projects in collaboration with indigenous networks.
Policy Analysis and
Evaluation
The Institute is
involved in a massive project studying the development of policy for the
education of adults based on the European Delphi Project: Lifelong Learning in
Europe - Towards Establishing the Needs and Policies for the Education of
Adults. The project now includes the 12 initial EEC countries, Estonia,
Slovenia, and the Czech Republic, Vancouver, Ontario and Michigan and over
2,000 adult education policy specialists.
National Symposia are being completed in preparation for the September
1995 Barcelona Conference. At that time we hope to have located the resources
to make the project international and completed by the UNESCO World Conference.
The goals of the project
are a comparative Delphi-type study about: a) per-ceived adult learning needs -
problems and challenges; b) the contribution of adult continuing education to
help solve key problems confronting indivi-duals and societies; c) the existing
policies and policy making/implementing structures; d) the shaping of national
and international policies; e) the contri-bution to the development of
comparative adult and continuing education policy studies.
By January 1996 the Institute will
have a roster of policy and program eval-uators available to participating
institutions in relation to their programs, the programs of the community
partners and regional, national and international policy making structures.
Curriculum and Cadre
Building
The June 1993
Institute meeting identified the organization of annual Spring/ Summer
Faculty/Graduate Seminars as the first step in collaboration regard-ing
curriculum and the training of cadres.
The first seminar Globalization of Adult Education: Practice,
Policy and Research held in the summer of 1994 involved seminar sessions at
the University of Michigan, Windsor, Toronto and Wayne State University and
field visits to a wide range of community-based adult education partners of
these institutions. The seminar involved intensive pre and post field visit
ses-sions, readings, lectures and discussions.
The second seminar Policy in Global Adult Education: Outcomes
from the Delphi Study, being planned for Leuven, Belgium before the
September 1995 con-ference, includes graduate students from participating
countries.
The third seminar
for the summer of 1996 deals with Global
Adult Education: North/South Realities and Options, and the fourth seminar
will be linked with the 1997 UNESCO World Congress: UNESCO and International Adult Education: Local and Global Policy,
Practice and Research.
We have also set up
a committee to develop travelling seminars on Democratization and the Voluntary Sector: Civic Literacy in
Multicultural Societies involving multi-site colloquia where the travelling
faculty/students meet local faculty/students and visit adult education
projects. If funding can be located for 1995, the first travelling seminar will
involve US/Canadian students visit-ing Slovenia, Hungary, the Czech Republic,
Slovakia and Poland, with brief-ing and de-briefing stops in Leiden (Netherlands).
In Spring 1996 the
International Institute will publish a compendium of adult higher education
curricular and degree offerings from all the participating
units/institutions. This will list the
curricula, degree requirements, costs, faculty, number of students, social
partners and collaborative projects, research, telecommunications, etc. We are also using this date as a deadline for
the negotiation of inter-university graduate degree programs using the common
summer seminars.
The globalization of adult education
and the need for inter-culturally trained adult higher education cadres is one
of the main reasons for this function of the Institute. It will require the use of comparative studies
and cross-cultural education, leading to a global perspective as it
develops. Our goal is to have 50
graduate students involved in this approach by the time of the UNESCO 1997
meetings.
Theory and Research
The findings of our
preliminary survey of research and theory development being undertaken at the
participating institutions were presented at the Vancouver International
Seminar (18-22 August 1993) and a seminar was held discussing the following
seven (7) questions related to the Institute's basic purpose:
1) Why should there be a field of politics,
policy and practice of the education of adults?
2) What are the problematics addressed by this
field?
3) What clarifications, specifications,
definitions are necessary before constructing such a field?
4) What are the behaviours and practices of
individuals, institutions, communities, societies and cultures involved?
5) How do we study the politics, policy and
practice in the field?
6) How do we develop theory from the study of
practice, politics and policy?
7) How do we organize a structure for such
research and can we create a theory group linked to the Institute?
(See Question de Formation, Vol. II, No. 4&5, 1990-91)
It was recommended
that we launch a Journal with an editorial board (the board to be the initial
theory group) and provide the place for continued theory discussion and theory
development. A date for the first issue of January 1996 has been fixed. A
study to review the current state of theory and those developing it will be
inaugurated by the Journal and published in time for the UNESCO 1997 meetings.
It has been suggested that we use the Delphi method developed by Professor
Walter Leirman for this study, leading to the development of a theory building
strategy.
Two additional projects in relation to
theory building were approved at the meetings in Belgium and are to be
completed by February 1997 or earlier:
• a study on the accelerated
production and application of knowledge, its impacts and the role of the
education of adults (individual and collective) for its constructive
integration;
• an international celebration of 2,500 years of
Book VII of Plato's Politea (The Republic), a work dedicated to continuing
lifelong education for the wise and just governance of society, including production
of a video and study guide.
The theory group
would start its annual meetings by 1996 and be responsible for one issue of the
journal per year.
At the Detroit meetings January 13-20,
1995, the above strategy was reviewed and reaffirmed. The consensus of the
group was that the activation of these projects was well underway and that the
1997 date was realistic.
Institute Structure:
Local
Units and International Networks
The structure of
the Institute emerges from the collaborative projects around the four institute
functions (see above) and the Institute's linkage to the local units (see
below). The local units and their social
partners would be linked by means of international resource networks as the
institutionalization of the collaborative projects.
A local unit can be an actual unit within
a given higher education institution and its social/community partners or it
can be a collaborative effort among a number of local institutions which are
able to carry out the essential functions of a local unit.
The structural
objective of the Institute is to have 100 local units with an average of four
social partners, or a total of 500 organizations, operational by summer 1997.
These local units would be linked to each other and the Institute by means of international networks assisting with
the four core functions, its six core activities, its collaborative activities
with its social/ community partners and by
its relation to the international and national adult education associations.
The four core functions are the activities which
make up the institute: indigenous networks, policy analysis and evaluation,
curriculum and cadre development, and theory and research.
The common local
units core activities are: program
development, distance education, open faculty, administration and
communications, evaluation and institutional research, and network building.
The collaborative activities with
community/social partners are developed by the local units with their own local
partners. The eight listed in the graphic are examples.These activities are to
be assisted by the international expert
networks.
The local units and
their community/social partners form the base of the Institute. The
International Networks are designed to assist them. It is a sys-tem designed
for both North/South and East/West collaboration. The system is non-hierarchical, making the institute a network of
networks and local units based on a series of collaborative projects with their
community and social partners. Such a system is designed to encourage
collaborative analyses, development of cooperative strategies and the effective
development of theory and practice.
Organizing Networks:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Jose BELTRAN Universitat de
Barcelona
Centre
of Research for Education
Pieter BATELAAN International Association
for Intercultural Education
Hilversum,
Netherlands
Eric BOCKSTAEL Wayne State University
College
of Lifelong Learning
Larry BERLIN University of
Michigan
College
of Education
Jean BLAIRON Question de Formation
Belgium
Marvin BOBES To Educate the
People Consortium
California
Fr. Liam CAREY St. Patrick's
College, Maynooth
Centre
for Aldut and Community Education
William CAVE University of
Michigan
Higher
and Adult Education
Vladimir CHOLVAD Slovak Ministry of
Education
Higher
and Adult Education
J. Linn COMPTON University of Wisconsin
(Madison)
Continuing
and Vocational Education
George CUSHINGBERRY
Jr. South East
Michigan Council of Governments
Adult
Education Task Force
John DARBY University of Ulster (Colerain)
INCORE
Project
Burton DUNBAR University of Missouri-Kansas City
Art
History
Ramon FLECHA-GARCIA Universitat de Barcelona
Divisio
de Ciencies de l'Educacio
Otto FEINSTEIN Wayne State University
To
Educate the People Consortium
Eric FENSTER To Educate the People Consortium
International
Adult Education
Keith FORRESTER University of Leeds
Department
of Adult Continuing Education
Etore GELPI Universite de Paris VIII
Adult
Education
Elisabeth GERVER University of Dundee
Centre
for Continuing Education
Jagdish GUNDARA University of London
Centre
for Multicultural Education
Pavel HARTL Charles
University (Prague)
Adult
Education and Social Work
Roger HIEMSTRA Syracuse University
Adult
Education
Pere HIMMELSTRUP Danish Cultural Institute
Copenhagen
Theo JANSEN Catholic
University of Nijmegen
Institute
for Social Pedagogy
Peter JARVIS University of
Surrey at Guildford
Department
of Educational Studies
Zoran JELENC Slovene Adult
Education Centre
Ljubljana
Jozsef KATUS Leiden University
Adult
Education and Information
Klaus KUNZEL University of
Koeln
Department
of Pedagogy
Larry LANDRY Rainbow Coalition
Washington,
DC
Organizing Networks:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Per LAURSEN University of
Copenhagen
Adult
Education
Walter LEIRMAN University of Leuven
Adult
Education
Pierre LEBOUTTE CARAT
Brussels
Talvi MARJA Tallin Pedagogic
University
Adult
Education
Pierre MARCHAL Catholic University of
Louvain
F.O.P.A.
Rodolfo MARTINEZ Wayne State University
Bi-Lingual
and Multicultural Education
Francois MARTOU Catholic Workers
Movement
Belgium
Keith McLEOD University of
Toronto
Education
Silva MEZNARIC University of Zagreb
Croatia
Cesare PITTO University of
Calabria
Anthropology
Eranz POEGELER Aachen Technical
University
Adult
Education
Kyell RUBENSON University of
Linkoeping (Sweden)
Adult
Education
Hans SCHUTZE University of
British Columbia
Adult
Education
Vida SPOLAR Slovene Centre
for Adult Education
Ljubljana
Rodolfo STAVENHAGEN Colegio de Mexico
Sociology-Anthropology
Milton STERN University of
California - Berkeley
Adult
and Continuing Education
Germaine STROBEL Michigan Ethnic Heritage
Studies Centre
Detroit
Walter TEMELINI University of Windsor
Modern
Literature and Languages
Valery TISHKOV Russion Academy of
Sciences
Institute
of Ethnology and Anthropology
Janos TOTH Hungarian Folk
High School Association
Budapest
Walter UEGAMA University of British
Columbia
Adult
and Continuing Education
Mara USTINOVA Institute for Pedagogy
Moscow
Dimitri VERGIDIS University of Patras
Adult
Education
Tashome WAGAW University of Michigan
Higher
and Adult Education
Nicholas WALTERS University of Surrey
Continuing
and Adult Education
Kevin WARD University of
Leeds
Adult
Continuing Education
Mitja ZAGAR University of
Ljubljana
Slovenia